Practice Areas
Practice made perfect.
Our Practice Areas
Provisional Patent Applications
Provisional patent applications offer a fast and low-cost way to secure an early filing date for your ideas. They also provide a one-year window before requiring to be followed up with a full patent application. You can also leverage provisionals by sequentially filing applications as your tech evolves throughout that year. Notably, you’re still allowed to claim “Patent Pending” during the one year. Further, you can still opt to keep your ideas private by deciding against following up with a full patent application. Ask us about our lite vs developed provisional applications.
Non-Provisional Patent Applications
Non-provisional patent applications are regular/full applications that proceed to the USPTO examination stage, as opposed to provisional applications which are more like a “deposit” of information to reserve a timestamp, but won’t ever become a patent on their own. When allowed, a non-provisional application results in a granted patent that gives you the right to exclude others from making, using, importing, selling, or even offering your invention for sale. Optionally, you may license or sell your patent.
Continuation, Continuation-In-Part, & Divisional Apps
Continuation applications allow for additional patents to grant around the same ideas. They provide many benefits, for example: obtaining additional patents with broadened or permutations of claim coverage, tailoring claims to cover competitors’ new products, keeping patent families alive and thereby competitors “guessing” about what may be claimed next, and continuing to demonstrate to investors, acquirers, and prospective employees the extent of the technology.
Utility Patent Applications
Utility patent applications (think “useful”) are non-provisional patent applications. They’re the patent application type that most people are usually referring to when discussing patents, as opposed to design (think design ornamentation) or plant (think horticulture) patents. Utility patents are the most important type of patent for tech because they protect the way inventions function and are used. For that reason, they’re ideal for protecting the high-tech arts with software, hardware, and mechanical patents.
International / PCT Patent Applications
PCT patent applications streamline the process of securing patents worldwide. There’s no such thing as a single “international patent” the protects globally, instead, patents must be pursued in each country of interest. PCT applications act as an easy staging area from which applications can distribute to each country, and also help defer expensive national filings for 2.5 years. Not only does this allow you more time to consider the market, but also consider how your USPTO application is performing.
PCT National Stage Patent Application Entry
Once a PCT patent application proceeds to each country of interest, it must be represented by a foreign associate that’s licensed to practice before that country’s patent office. Our firm collaborates with such foreign associates to manage the prosecution in each country according to their unique laws. Further, because we oversee each country’s foreign associates, we’re able to direct a coordinated global strategy.
IP Strategy & Counseling
IP strategy & counseling goes beyond just filing applications. It’s about developing a winning long-term plan to ultimately establish a comprehensive patent portfolio. For example, identifying patentable inventions, deciding on filing timelines and countries, and optimizing costs. And many other considerations like increasing the chances of receiving patent grants and positioning the portfolio to be more attractive to investors and acquirers.
Patent Harvesting & Invention Disclosure Meetings
Patent harvesting meetings involve exploring you and your team’s various ideas, and deciding which are best pursued. Then, during following invention disclosure meetings, we dive deep into each idea to gain a high level of understanding so that we may prepare a patent application that thoroughly captures and protects the subject matter. We may also decide to strategically combine or separate the ideas among patent applications.
Prior Art Searches
Prior art searches serve to reveal what inventions might already exist in your tech area, whether in the patent system or the public domain at large. It can be helpful to discover prior art for many reasons- like adjusting the filing strategy up front to negotiate around the prior art, thereby saving time and money. Or, clearing more prior art such that it’s less likely to be successfully used in proceedings against your patent. Meanwhile, there are competing considerations for why you may not always want to conduct prior art searches.
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Opinions
Freedom to Operate (FTO) opinions act like a green light for your business venture. By analyzing existing patents, FTO opinions assess the likelihood of your operations to infringe on someone else’s intellectual property rights, thereby reducing legal risk and expensive litigation. If any roadblocks are discovered, the FTO opinion affords you an opportunity to modify your operations for a smoother path to market.
Patentability Opinions
Patentability opinions offer a sneak peek into your inventions’ chances of success at the patent office. For example, not all ideas are of the nature that the USPTO will grant patents for, even if they’re a new idea. Or, certain tech areas are quite crowded, thereby making it difficult for an idea with too small of an incremental improvement to reach patent grant. Knowing to adjust the strategy upfront can save time, money, and success.
Acquisition Due Diligence
When your company’s in the process of being purchased, acquisition due diligence of your IP portfolio will almost certainly be conducted. To avoid hurdles and keep the sale process moving along, your portfolio should be organized and in good health, with knowledgeable patent attorneys available to field all questions. In fact, your IP assets should work to maximize the valuation of your business.
Entity Size Discounts
Very often, we’re able to qualify your patent filings for USPTO discounts based on your entity size. The discounts vary from 60% off for small entities up to 80% off for micro entities. Further, in most cases, these discounts apply not only to the initial filing fees, but to almost all other fees throughout the prosecution stage and the life of the granted patent. Many clients can qualify for the micro entity discounts, while even more can qualify for the small entity discounts. Either way, eventually thousands of dollars could be saved over the 20-year life of a patent.
Prioritized Examination
Patent applications filed with accelerated examination requests dramatically speeds up the patent prosecution stage. Through the USPTO’s Track One program, the patent office guarantees fast-tracking examination to condense what typically takes many years into 12 months or even less. Further, such prioritized patent applications tend to have a higher allowance rate. Expediting in this way can arguably cut total patent costs, and more quickly recoup costs through earlier licensing or product launches.
“Stealth-mode” Nonublication Requests
By default, patent applications publish generally 18 months following their filing date. However, a nonpublication request can be used to keep your ideas in stealth mode, where they’re only made public if a patent is eventually granted. Meanwhile, an early publication request can be used to apprise investors and buyers while putting competitors on notice. Each strategy comes with their own advantages and disadvantages.
Requests for Continued Examination (RCE)
Requests for Continued Examination (RCE) allow you to continue pursuing your patent application at the USPTO. For example, when a so-called “final” office action is issued, and RCE allows you to restart the clock, but continue from where you’ve reached in the process. An RCE provides other advantages too, like an opportunity to request Track One prioritized examination.
Appeals before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board
If we disagree with a USPTO patent examiner’s rejection, then an appeals process can be pursued, where initially two more examiners are brought in to review our arguments. If there’s still disagreement, the question can be appealed to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board, which offers a chance to challenge the examiner’s position before a panel of neutral judges and get your patent application back on track.
Office Action Responses
Responding to Office Actions involves replying to the patent office’s “actions”. For example, with respect to your patent application, the patent office may issue an action that rejects the claims, objects to the drawings, or raises other issues that stand in the way patent allowance. Office Action responses argue against and/or make amendments to overcome the Office Action’s assertions, eventually leading to a granted patent.
Software Patents
Artificial Intelligence Patents
We’ve been working on AI long before its popularity exploded in recent times. Accordingly, we know our way around both the technology and its unique legal hurdles. From machine learning models to deep learning neural networks, our work spans a wide range of applications such as computer vision, NLP, generative AI, autonomous vehicles + drones, and robotics. With applications in entertainment & media, finance & banking, healthcare, and transportation.